ArticleGlobal public health2025
Fever pitch: Coloniality and contention within community health's yellow fever response in Kenya.
Article in Global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In January 2022, a number of Yellow Fever cases were identified in Kenya's Isiolo County for the first time, triggering a national-level response centred on vaccinating residents. 181,000 people were vaccinated in July, around 72% of the eligible population. In the face of this ostensible success, this article explores the continuing coloniality, that is, long-standing patterns of domination, operating within disease control in Kenya's northeast, whereby punitive encounters with the state loom large. Despite health matters being devolved, top-down implementation from nationally-controlled actors exacerbated local distrust, resulting in contention around the roll-out and of the authorities behind it. This article, drawing on ethnography supplemented by in-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions over 12 months 2022-2023, centres the experiences of Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) over the ten-day campaign. We adopt a Fanonian lens to interpret our findings, historicizing the contention CHVs faced from their communities, in a region where governmental approaches oscillate between neglect and heavy-handed remedial action. We operationalise Fanon's 'psychoexistential complex', whereby CHVs internalise the conflict between their roles of community representative and state-enforcer, exacerbated by their precarity and invisibility to others. We conclude with a call for CHVs' place to be protected, capacitated and seen within outbreak response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.