Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544414›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025

Anatomical structures of the obturator foramen and its importance for pelvic interventıons.

Ozden Bedre Duygu, Figen Govsa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ozden Bedre DuyguDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey.
Figen GovsaDepartment of Anatomy, Digital Imaging and 3D Modelling Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. fgovsa@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical scenarios such as pelvic fractures, damage to the obturator neurovascular bundle, obturator neuropraxia, and mesh placement in patients with incontinence, preserving the anatomical structures related to the obturator foramen (OF) is crucial. This study aims to investigate the anatomical variations of the OF as a guide for identifying failure criteria and improving success parameters in clinical practice.

methodsThe OFs of one hundred adult dry pelvic bones were examined. Measurements were evaluated using ImageJ software. The morphology of the OF and the presence of bony projections on the inner surface of the foramen were assessed.

resultsThe anterior-posterior length was 5.24 ± 0.8 cm on the right and 5.17 ± 0.87 cm on the left. The superior-inferior length was 4.69 ± 1.83 cm on the right and 4.66 ± 1.69 cm on the left. The anterior-posterior vertical angle was 98.21 ± 9.95° on the right and 98.48 ± 13.9° on the left; the superior-inferior horizontal angle was 90.7 ± 10.95° on the right and 97.56 ± 9.42° on the left. The OF was categorized into six distinct types: quadrilateral (23%), ellipsoid (22%), and oval (17%). The ellipsoid-type OF showed a greater anterior-posterior length compared to the other types, while the triangular-type OF exhibited a greater symphysis pubis length. Notably, bony projections on the anterior edge of the inner surface of the OF were observed in 33% of cases. Additionally, bony projections on the posterior edge of the OF were described for the first time.

conclusionIn cases where OF is narrow and variable, and where bony projections are present on its inner surface, performing an osteotomy may help protect the obturator neurovascular bundle.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationObturator NervePelvic BonesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBony pelvisObturator foramenPubic arch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.