Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544391›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025

From "time is brain" to "time is collaterals": updates on the role of cerebral collateral circulation in stroke.

Mangiardi Marilena, Pezzella Francesca Romana, Alfano Guido, De Rubeis Gianluca, Fabiano Sebastiano, Pampana Enrico, Anticoli Sabrina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A combined extract ofJournal of ginseng research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mangiardi Marilena *Department of Stroke Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, 00152, Italy. marilena.mangiardi@uniroma1.it.
Pezzella Francesca Romana *Department of Stroke Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, 00152, Italy.
Alfano GuidoDepartment of M.G.Vannini Hospital, Via di Acqua Bullicante 4, Rome, 00177, Italy.
De Rubeis GianlucaDepartment of Neuroradiology and Interventional Neuroradiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, 00152, Italy.
Fabiano SebastianoDepartment of Neuroradiology and Interventional Neuroradiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, 00152, Italy.
Pampana EnricoDepartment of Neuroradiology and Interventional Neuroradiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, 00152, Italy.
Anticoli SabrinaDepartment of Stroke Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, Rome, 00152, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains the leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. While revascularization therapies-such as intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)-have significantly improved outcomes, their success is strongly influenced by the status of cerebral collateral circulation. Collateral vessels sustain cerebral perfusion during vascular occlusion, limiting infarct growth and extending therapeutic windows. Despite this recognized importance, standardized methods for assessing collateral status and integrating it into treatment strategies are still evolving. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the role of collateral circulation in AIS, focusing on its impact on infarct dynamics, treatment efficacy, and functional recovery. We highlight findings from major clinical trials-including MR CLEAN, DAWN, DEFUSE-3, and SWIFT PRIME which consistently demonstrate that robust collateral networks are associated with improved outcomes and expanded eligibility for reperfusion therapies. Advances in neuroimaging, such as multiphase CTA and perfusion MRI, alongside emerging AI-driven automated collateral grading, are reshaping patients' selection and clinical decision-making. We also discuss novel therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing collateral flow, such as vasodilators, neuroprotective agents, statins, and stem cell therapies. Despite growing evidence supporting collateral-based treatment approaches, real-time clinical implementation remains limited by challenges in standardization and access.

conclusionCerebral collateral circulation is a critical determinant of stroke prognosis and treatment response. Incorporating collateral assessment into acute stroke workflows-supported by advanced imaging, artificial intelligence, and personalized medicine-offers a promising pathway to optimize outcomes. As the field moves beyond a strict "time is brain" model, the emerging paradigm of "time is collaterals" may better reflect the dynamic interplay between perfusion, tissue viability, and therapeutic opportunity in AIS management.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationCollateral CirculationIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansNeuroimagingThrombectomyThrombolytic TherapyAcute ischemic strokeCerebral collateral circulationIntravenous thrombolysisNeuroimaging.Thrombectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.