ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Venous thromboembolism diagnosis definition in claims data: implications for research.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification After Pancreatic and Liver Cancer Surgery Using Claims Data.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The incidence and associated factors of pulmonary embolism after cardiac surgery: A retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Poverty and Mortality Risk in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Thrombosis in patients with cancer: challenges and advances.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To examine whether the variability in ICD codes used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) definition among published studies affects VTE rates and associations detected from claims data. We extracted the ICD codes used for VTE definition from three published studies and proposed a new VTE definition based on clinical review of all utilized ICD codes. We compared these four definitions to assess differences in VTE rates and associated variables using a standardized scenario. We used a random 25% sample of the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics database and analyzed patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The primary outcome was 90-day post-discharge VTE. The association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with VTE was assessed using bivariate and multivariable main effects logistic regression models. There were substantial differences in the use of ICD codes among the 4 VTE definitions (range 116 to 304 ICD-9/10 codes). Our population included 2,122 eligible patients (median age 59 years, 47% female) and the rate of VTE ranged from 2.3% to 4.4% using the four definitions. Multivariable analysis showed that the associations between VTE and age and type of surgery (esophageal surgery, gastric surgery) varied depending on the VTE definition used while the Elixhauser comorbidity score and liver surgery type were consistently associated with VTE. In this pilot study, differences in the incidence of VTE and associated risk factors were influenced by the choice of ICD9/10 codes used to define VTE. A standardized definition of VTE may improve the reproducibility and rigor of findings based on administrative claims data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.