ArticleEcology2025
Hidden influence of fire on locally rare and cryptic reptile species.
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fire responses in animal communities have been well studied, but little is known about the effects of fire on rare species due to limitations in data and modeling frameworks. Using a suite of methods to account for rarity, dominance, and incomplete sampling, we aimed to determine how post-fire succession influenced locally rare and cryptic reptile species in semiarid mallee woodlands in southern Australia. Contemporary fires in this system are typically high-intensity wildfires or prescribed fires, which raze aboveground vegetation. Reptiles were sampled from pitfall traps over two summer seasons (1400 trap nights) at 14 sites spanning three fire history categories based on time since the last fire: recently burnt (2-3 years post fire), medium (7-9 years), and long unburnt (42-48 years). The data comprised 2138 individual reptiles from 41 species. The effects of fire history were evident in diversity metrics where proportional abundances were weighted toward rare species (Shannon's Diversity, Fisher's α), but not in those emphasizing common species (Simpson's Diversity, Berger-Parker Index) or species richness. There were no effects of fire history on the richness or abundance of locally rare species when examined directly. However, fire effects on rare species diversity were detectable in one sub-assemblage including 20 species with fewer than eight total observations. This result indicated higher diversity in unburnt habitat; an effect that was masked when numerically dominant species were included in the analysis. When accounting for incomplete sampling using rarefaction and extrapolation, unburnt habitat was more diverse, accumulated species more quickly, and required a greater sampling effort to obtain sample coverage comparable to recently burnt and medium habitat. Overall, common and abundant reptile species appeared to dominate recently burnt and mid-succession habitats, while reptile communities in long unburnt habitat were more diverse because they had more rare or cryptic species. The data suggest that responses of rare species to fire history are harder to detect than common, dominant species which are often favored by disturbance (and scientific research). Fire management which maintains some early- and mid-successional habitat, while strategically conserving unburnt habitat, should benefit rare and cryptic reptile species in this system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.