Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544288›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025

Comparative efficacy of remifentanil and fentanyl in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on ventilation duration and delirium incidence.

Hiromu Okano, Eriya Imai, Hiroshi Okamoto, Masaaki Sakuraya, Yoshitaka Aoki, Shun Muramatsu, Misa Kitamura, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Yuki Kataoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hiromu OkanoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo , 104-8560, Japan. okanohiromu0121@gmail.com.
Eriya ImaiDepartment of Social Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, 4‑1‑26 Akasaka, Minato City, Tokyo , 107‑8402, Japan.
Hiroshi OkamotoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo , 104-8560, Japan.
Masaaki SakurayaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Jigozen 1‑3‑3, Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima , 738‑8503, Japan.
Yoshitaka AokiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, H Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Higashi‑ku,, 1‑20‑1 Handayama, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka , 431‑3192, Japan.
Shun MuramatsuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo , 104-8560, Japan.
Misa KitamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Tsutomu YamazakiDepartment of Social Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, 4‑1‑26 Akasaka, Minato City, Tokyo , 107‑8402, Japan.
Yuki KataokaScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ultrashort-acting properties and organ-independent metabolism of remifentanil may be advantageous in mechanical ventilation management. Unlike fentanyl, which accumulates over time and may prolong sedation, remifentanil enables more predictable titration and rapid weaning. This study aimed to determine the effect of remifentanil on shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation in comparison with fentanyl in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to July 2024. Studies comparing remifentanil with fentanyl in mechanically ventilated ICU patients were included, whereas those that used only remifentanil or fentanyl intraoperatively were excluded. The primary outcome was ventilation duration, with a minimal important difference (MID) of 90 min. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools.

resultsWe included 18 studies (14 RCTs and 4 observational studies). Ten studies (8 RCTs and 2 observational studies; 901 patients) were analysed. Remifentanil may reduce ventilation duration compared to fentanyl (8 RCTs: MD -6.70 h, 95% CI -14.36 to 0.97; low certainty; 2 observational studies: MD -21.26 h, 95% CI -37.29 to -5.24; low certainty).

conclusionsRemifentanil may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, potentially improving patient outcomes. However, owing to the low certainty of the evidence and study heterogeneity, further high-quality RCTs are required to validate these findings.

trial registrationPROSPERO 2024 and CRD42024557414.

Indexed as

Critical careFentanylMechanical ventilationMeta-analysisRemifentanilSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40544288
PMCPMC12182676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.