ArticleBMC oral health2025
Automated detection and classification of osteolytic lesions in panoramic radiographs using CNNs and vision transformers.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transformer-based models in dentistry: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiseases underlying osteolytic lesions in jaws are characterized by the absorption of bone tissue and are often asymptomatic, delaying their diagnosis. Well-defined lesions (benign cyst-like lesions) and ill-defined lesions (osteomyelitis or malignancy) can be detected early in a panoramic radiograph (PR) by an experienced examiner, but most dentists lack appropriate training. To support dentists, this study aimed to develop and evaluate deep learning models for the detection of osteolytic lesions in PRs.
methodsA dataset of 676 PRs (165 well-defined, 181 ill-defined, 330 control) was collected from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Charité Berlin, Germany. The osteolytic lesions were pixel-wise segmented and labeled as well-defined or ill-defined. Four model architectures for instance segmentation (Mask R-CNN with a Swin-Tiny or ResNet-50 backbone, Mask DINO, and YOLOv5) were employed with five-fold cross-validation. Their effectiveness was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC and failure cases were shown.
resultsMask R-CNN with a Swin-Tiny backbone was most effective (well-defined F1 = 0.784, AUC = 0.881; ill-defined F1 = 0.904, AUC = 0.971) and the model architectures including vision transformer components were more effective than those without. Model mistakes were observed around the maxillary sinus, at tooth extraction sites, and for radiolucent bands.
conclusionsPromising deep learning models were developed for the detection of osteolytic lesions in PRs, particularly those with vision transformer components (Mask R-CNN with Swin-Tiny and Mask DINO). These results underline the potential of vision transformers for enhancing the automated detection of osteolytic lesions, offering a significant improvement over traditional deep learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.