ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Analysis of Phase I Clinical Trial Design of Anti-Cancer Agents.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting Glypican-3 in Liver Cancer: Groundbreaking Preclinical and Clinical Insights.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2000, there have been cancer research and regulatory changes in the development of anti-cancer therapies. The broadening understanding of cancer biology, coupled with advances in molecular biology and technology, has led to the development of new cancer drugs with diverse mechanisms of action. This study aims to analyze the trends and major features of Phase 1 clinical trial designs for anti-cancer agents approved by the U.S. FDA between 2013 and 2024. Out of the 143 anticancer drugs approved between 2013 and 2024, targeted therapies were the most common drug class, accounting for 86 approvals. Notably, there has been a recent increase in the approval of bi-specific T-cell engagers. Lung cancer and leukemia each had the highest number of initial indications, with 24 and 21 drugs for each. It was considered that the primary objective of phase I study was to determine DLT (Dose-Limiting Toxicity), MTD (Maximum Tolerated Dose), and RP2D (Recommended Phase 2 Dose), with secondary objectives focusing on observing antitumor responses, regardless of drug class. The overall design features of Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs can be described as 'non-randomized,' 'open,' 'without comparison,' and 'seamless dose expansion'. During the research period from 2013 to 2024, the 3 + 3 dose escalation design has seemed remained the most commonly used approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40544230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.