ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025
Unraveling time-dependent genetic components underlying alcohol response.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While numerous studies have examined the subjective response to alcohol as an intermediate phenotype to understand its variability, heritability, and predictive capacity for alcohol-related disorders, in-depth analyses linking alcohol reactivity indicators to genetic factors within a large cohort have been absent. Our study aimed to quantify the exact contribution of each genetic variant relevant to the alcohol metabolism to the variability in alcohol response. Specifically, we focused on two primary genes involved in alcohol metabolism (ALDH2 and ADH1B) and three additional loci (ALDH1B1, ALDH1A1, and GCKR) that have been shown to have significant associations with drinking behaviors in Japanese individuals. We conducted the first study to assess the relationship between subjective response to alcohol (SR), evaluated by various assessment subscales, and genetic factors using an intravenous clamp technique in 429 healthy Japanese young adults. By reducing the dimensionality of the data to assess similarity structures, we identified three distinct clusters of SRs and participants. Each participant cluster exhibited a distinct alcohol response profile shaped by specific genetic contributions. Participant cluster 1 demonstrated the strongest response, followed by participant cluster 2, and then participant cluster 3. Participant cluster 1 may also be the most strongly influenced by the allelic status of ALDH2 and ADH1B. SR patterns varied accordingly, and the enrichment of the ALDH2*2 and ADH1B*2, differed across both participant and subscale clusters. Notably, the three participant clusters closely aligned with the three subscale clusters, highlighting a consistent genotype-phenotype relationship. Furthermore, the proportion of variance explained by these genes also varied across subscale clusters. Contrary to known functions, ADH1B showed associations at later timings when ALDH2 associations attenuate. Our three-cluster classification may improve prevention by enabling early identification of individuals at health risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.