Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544203›Full record

ArticleBiodegradation2025

Biodegradation of pretilachlor and butachlor by novel bacterial strains isolated from paddy field soil.

Nguyen Thi Oanh, Ha Danh Duc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nguyen Thi OanhDong Thap University, 783 Pham Huu Lau Street, Cao Lanh City, Dong Thap Province, Vietnam.
Ha Danh DucDong Thap University, 783 Pham Huu Lau Street, Cao Lanh City, Dong Thap Province, Vietnam. hadanhduc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4862-2082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, two pretilachlor-degrading bacterial strains isolated from soil, Enterobacter sp. Pre1 and Pseudomonas sp. Pre2 completely utilized the compound as a sole carbon, energy and nitrogen source under aerobic conditions. The determination of degradation kinetics revealed that the rates of both isolates followed the Michaelis-Menten model, in which the maximum utilization rates of Enterobacter sp. Pre1 and Pseudomonas sp. Pre2 were 0.010 ± 0.0012 and 0.0060 ± 0.0007 mM/h, respectively. Moreover, Pseudomonas sp. Pre2 exhibited effective degradation of butachlor. Enterobacter sp. Pre1 showed better biofilm formation than the later one. Their immobilized biomass in polyurethane foam (PUF) reached 323.4 ± 35.6 mg/g PUF completely degrading pretilachlor at 0.15 mM within 12 h in a packed bed bioreactor. A metabolite, 2,6-diethylaniline, was produced during the degradation by both strains. Besides, 4-amino-3,5-diethyl phenol and aniline were the metabolites in the degradation by Enterobacter sp. Pre1 and Pseudomonas sp. Pre2, respectively. This study confirmed the efficiency and mechanisms in the degradation of pretilachlor by freely suspended and immobilized cells of the isolated bacteria.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesEnterobacterPseudomonasSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalKineticsAcetanilidesbutachlorSoil PollutantsDegradationImmobilized biomassMetabolitesPretilachlor

Identifiers

PMID40544203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.