ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
A centralised immunogen approach to develop a more broadly protective modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 vaccine candidate.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More efficacious vaccines are required to improve control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSV). One strategy that has shown promise is the use of centralized antigens, generated from consensus sequence data. Here, we evaluated the consensus sequence approach to develop a PRRSV-1 modified live virus (MLV) vaccine candidate, 'EU-PRRSV-Con'. EU-PRRSV-Con strain was engineered by inserting consensus sequence open-reading frames encoding envelope proteins of 67 PRRSV-1 strains into an attenuated PRRSV-1 strain backbone. EU-PRRSV-Con was evaluated in pigs and benchmarked against a licensed MLV vaccine. Efficacy was assessed against three different PRRSV-1 isolates. Neutralizing antibodies were elicited by EU-PRRSV-Con, which were more reactive than those induced by the licensed MLV. EU-PRRSV-Con provided better levels of protection (reduced viral loads and lung pathology) than the licensed MLV, although the efficacy against a divergent PRRSV-1 subtype 3 strain was more limited. These data support the development of EU-PRRSV-Con as a vaccine that may aid control of PRRSV-1.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.