ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025
Extremely deep bounce dives: planning and physiological challenges based on the experiences of a sample of French-speaking technical divers.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revised guideline for central nervous system oxygen toxicity exposure limits when using an inspired PO2 of 1.3 atmospheres.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Guideline
- Heliox versus trimix in closed-circuit rebreather diving: A comparative study of pulmonary and decompression stress in male divers.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Imbalanced cortisol/BDNF signals and oxidative stress underscore temporary cognitive impairment in deep divers after in water/surface decompression: proof of concept.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Technical diving accidents in France: a 15-year retrospective study reporting a high prevalence of musculoskeletal decompression sickness.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extreme deep technical diving presents significant physiological challenges. While procedures often blend elements from both recreational and commercial diving, many remain empirical and unvalidated for this purpose. The rise of closed-circuit rebreathers has reduced gas cost and logistical barriers, enabling more divers to reach unprecedented depths. This study, based on the experience of deep divers, explores the limits of extreme-depth diving and the strategies developed to overcome them. Methods: Eight rebreather divers (one female, seven males) with experience beyond 200 metres depth were interviewed regarding their preparation, planning, and execution of such dives. The dive profiles of their deepest dives were analysed. Results: All were highly experienced technical divers. The median maximal depth was 227 [209-302] metres, with a median total dive time of 290 [271-395] minutes. The gas density of the trimix mixture, oxygen exposure, and ascent rate consistently exceeded current recommendations. High pressure nervous syndrome did not appear to be a major limiting factor, whereas decompression posed greater challenges. Three divers experienced decompression sickness following their deepest dives, highlighting the uncertainty around decompression procedures. Conclusions: These dives require rigorous preparation, robust support systems, equipment modifications, and perfect skills to reduce risks, which remain excessively high. Data are lacking to validate current practices. Decompression procedures must be adapted for these demanding mixed-gas dives, which are inevitably prolonged. A dry underwater habitat could improve decompression tolerance. The role of hydrogen as a breathing gas remains uncertain and still needs to be clarified, but some consider it a promising avenue for further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.