Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40544147›Full record

ReviewDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025

Advances in the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a diving bell.

Graham Johnson, Phil Bryson, Andrew Tabner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Graham JohnsonUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Emergency Department, Royal Derby Hospital, United Kingdom.
Phil BrysonTAC Healthcare, Wellheads Crescent, Wellheads Industrial Estate, Dyce, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Andrew TabnerUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Emergency Department, Royal Derby Hospital, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary discusses the provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to casualties in a diving bell. This single resource consolidates recent advances in the field, published in different medical journals, to support dissemination across the wider diving industry. It summarises the evaluation of techniques for the provision of manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to a seated casualty, including head-to-chest, knee-to-chest, and prone knee-to-chest compression delivery, and concludes that the only safe and potentially effective approach in a diving bell setting without room for a supine casualty is knee-to-chest CPR. The evaluation of a mechanical CPR device is discussed; it is found to be as effective as existing devices and manual CPR in terms of compression efficacy and is well-suited to the setting. The development of a bespoke resuscitation algorithm, together with deviations from accepted advanced life support algorithm principles, is presented. A novel 'upright CPR' technique for the provision of CPR to a seated casualty, developed during the algorithm evaluation process, is described. Finally, areas where evidence is still lacking, and research priorities for the future, are discussed; a key area for future work is the development and testing of a defibrillator suited to a diving bell setting, where space constraints, a heliox atmosphere, and the risk of both fire and rescuer injury are ever-present.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationDivingAlgorithmsDefibrillatorsHumansPostureCardiac arrestDecompression illnessDiving deathsDiving incidentsDiving researchSaturation diving

Identifiers

PMID40544147
PMCPMC12520990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.