SynthesisDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025
Electroencephalographic (EEG) changes accompanying normal breathing of concentrated oxygen (hyperoxic ventilation) by healthy adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Divers often increase their fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO₂) to decrease their risk of decompression sickness. However, breathing elevated pressures of oxygen can cause central nervous system oxygen toxicity (CNS-OT). This study aimed to review the literature describing the effect of hyperoxia on the electroencephalogram (EEG), thus exploring the potential for real-time detection of an impending CNS-OT seizure. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles that reported EEG measures accompanying hyperoxic ventilation (FIO₂ = 1.0 ± hyperbaric pressure) in healthy participants. We included peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and government reports with no language or date restrictions. Randomised controlled trials and cross-over studies were included; case reports were excluded. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to evaluate evidence quality. Results: Our search strategy returned 1,025 unique abstracts; we analysed the full text of 46 articles; 22 articles (16 studies) were included for review. Study cohorts were typically small and comprised of male non-divers. We discovered a variety of EEG analysis methods: studies performed spectral analysis (n = 12), the analysis of sensory-evoked potentials (n = 4), connectivity/complexity analysis (n = 3), source localisation (n = 1), and expert qualitative analyses (n = 4). Studies of severe exposures (long duration at hyperbaric pressure) typically reported qualitative measures, and studies of mild exposures typically reported quantitative measures. Conclusions: There is a need for a large randomised controlled trial reporting quantitative measures to better understand the effect of hyperoxia on the EEG, thus enabling the development of real-time monitoring of CNS-OT risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.