ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025
Effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy initiation latency on auditory outcomes following acute acoustic trauma.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Cognitive Impairment Resulting from Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms of Action and Application Advances.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) is a potential adjunct treatment to improve hearing following acute acoustic trauma. However, the optimal time frame for HBO initiation has not been elucidated. Methods: Patients exposed to intense noise as part of active military service that met our audiometric criteria were referred for combined HBO (253 kPa for 80 min, treatment numbers titrated to response) and corticosteroid treatment. The primary outcome was defined as an improvement of at least 10 dB in any of the measured high pure tone frequencies (3, 4, 6 or 8 kHz). Additional outcomes included the absolute change in high pure tone (3, 4, 6 and 8 kHz) summation (HPTS), relative change in HPTS compared to baseline (rHPTS) and the proportion of patients returned to auditory combat readiness. Results: Of 129 ears (103 patients) included in the final analysis, 59/67 (88%) of the patients treated within seven days but only 14/25 (56%) of patients treated 21 days or more from exposure met the primary outcome (Bonferroni adjusted P = 0.002). Similarly, HPTS improvement (55 dB vs -5dB), rHPTS improvement (55% vs 3%) and return to combat readiness (32/56 (57%) vs 3/20 (15%)) were significantly (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.017, respectively) more pronounced in patients treated earlier. These results were unchanged despite adjusting to age, degree of initial hearing loss and the mechanism of injury. Conclusions: Early initiation of HBO following acute acoustic trauma is associated with improved response to therapy. The optimal treatment latency appears to be within seven days from injury, with response rates dropping when treatment is delayed beyond three weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.