ArticleNeuropsychologia2025
The categorical effect of negative emotion on memory before and after sleep deprivation.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman memory tends to bias negative over neutral information. Recent evidence suggests that this bias may be due to a categorical effect of emotionally salient information, which diminishes when negative information is less frequent. Moreover, sleep loss has been shown to impair memory. Here, we aimed to replicate this categorical-over valence-bias for emotional information and determine the influence of total sleep deprivation (TSD) on this effect.
methodsForty-four healthy adults completed two learning-and-memory tasks: once before and once after a night of TSD. In each task, they were presented with 100 words ranging from neutral to negative. Participants were randomized into a "high" (50 % of words were negative) or "low" (12.5 % negative words) frequency condition. Recognition memory was assessed after a brief delay.
resultsContrary to our hypothesis, we did not observe a shift in negative memory bias based on frequency condition. Before TSD, participants in both conditions ("high" and "low") recalled more negative words than neutral words. Memory was impaired after TSD, for both negative and neutral words, yet a similar negative memory bias persisted across both the high and low frequency conditions, as measured by hit rate and sensitivity. Despite an absence of interaction between valence and condition, we observed a condition-related difference after TSD, with participants in the "low" condition adopting a more liberal response strategy, demonstrating a greater tendency to label all words as old compared to those in the "high" condition.
conclusionsA significant memory bias for negative words was present for both frequency conditions, both before and after TSD. While we were unable to replicate the loss of an emotional memory bias with altered frequency, we did find some evidence that frequency may interact with sleep loss to influence response strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.