Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40543565›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2025

Manipulating memory processing during sleep to explore the critical duration of reactivation events.

Andrew Lazarus, Adrianna Bassard, Eitan Schechtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew LazarusDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Adrianna BassardDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior & Center for Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. Electronic address: eitans@uci.edu.

Funding

The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansR00MH122663 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2023 to 2025
$933k
The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansK99MH122663 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2021 to 2022
$186k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH122663NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newly encoded memories are reactivated and consolidated during sleep. However, how the reactivation of a specific memory unfolds over time is poorly understood. What are the temporal dynamics of a single reactivation event within a period of sleep? Does extending a single reactivation opportunity translate to stronger memory benefits? We explored these dynamics by utilizing targeted memory reactivation (TMR), a technique that biases the consolidation of memories via the unobtrusive presentation of memory-associated cues during sleep. Participants learned the on-screen positions of sixty objects, each linked with a unique sound (e.g., cat - meow). Some sounds were then presented during non-REM sleep, with the duration allotted for reactivation causally controlled by varying the timing of the interstimulus interval. TMR did not lead to uniform improvement in memory, and no differences were observed between objects allotted short (2.5 s) and long (7.5 s) reactivation windows. However, memory for objects allotted short windows was impacted by TMR in an encoding-strength-dependent manner, with poorly encoded objects benefiting the most. Classification models trained on EEG data revealed memory reactivation that was time-locked to sound onset during sleep, and this measure of reactivation was linked with memory gains one week later. We did not find evidence for reactivation that extended beyond the time window immediately after sound onset (<2 s). Although our results are not entirely conclusive, they suggest that the critical processes supporting memory consolidation conclude within <2 s after reactivation onset and that extended reactivation windows do not confer additional benefits.

Indexed as

BrainMemory ConsolidationSleepAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung AdultMemory consolidationMemory reactivationSleepTargeted memory reactivation

Identifiers

PMID40543565
PMCPMC12478543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.