ArticleSchizophrenia research2025
Subjective emotional experiences in clinical high-risk youth: Insights from a dyadic interaction paradigm.
Article in Schizophrenia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alterations in emotional functioning are a characteristic symptom of psychotic disorders. The clinical high-risk (CHR) period provides an important time for investigating early mechanisms, and their relation to psychosis vulnerability. However, our understanding of subjective emotional experiences in this critical population, particularly contextualized within social interactions, is limited. To address this gap, the present study aimed to evaluate subjective emotional experiences in CHR youth (12-30) using an experimental dyadic interaction paradigm. The sample included 148 individuals, 36 CHR-Partner dyads and 41 Control-Partner dyads, who engaged in three 10-min dyadic interactions (i.e., neutral, conflict, and pleasant). Following each conversation, participants reported the intensity of their positive and negative emotional experiences. Participants also completed a series of structured clinical interviews. CHR youth reported greater negative emotional experiences following pleasant conversations than control youth (U(74) = 533.5, p = 0.035). In CHR youth, greater negative emotional experiences following neutral conversations were associated with greater positive (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.