ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Three-dimensional U-Net with transfer learning improves automated whole brain delineation from MRI brain scans of rats, mice, and monkeys.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Atlas-Based MRI Segmentation Enable Longitudinal Characterization of Healthy Mouse Brain.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutomated whole-brain delineation (WBD) techniques often struggle to generalize across pre-clinical studies due to variations in animal models, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, and tissue contrasts. We developed a 3D U-Net neural network for WBD pre-trained on organophosphate intoxication (OPI) rat brain MRI scans. We used transfer learning (TL) to adapt this OPI-pretrained network to other animal models: rat model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), mouse model of tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) intoxication, and titi monkey model of social bonding.
methodsWe assessed an OPI-pretrained 3D U-Net across animal models under three conditions: (1) direct application to each dataset; (2) utilizing TL; and (3) training disease-specific U-Net models. For each condition, training dataset size (TDS) was optimized, and output WBDs were compared to manual segmentations for accuracy.
resultsThe OPI-pretrained 3D U-Net (TDS = 100) achieved the best accuracy [median[min-max]] for the test OPI dataset with a Dice coefficient (DC) = [0.987 [0.977-0.992]] and Hausdorff distance (HD) = [0.86 [0.55-1.27]]mm. TL improved generalization across all models [AD (TDS = 40): DC = 0.987 [0.977-0.992] and HD = 0.72 [0.54-1.00]mm; TETS (TDS = 10): DC = 0.992 [0.984-0.993] and HD = 0.40 [0.31-0.50]mm; Monkey (TDS = 8): DC = 0.977 [0.968-0.979] and HD = 3.03 [2.19-3.91]mm], showing performance comparable to disease-specific networks.
conclusionsThe OPI-pretrained 3D U-Net with TL achieved accuracy comparable to disease-specific networks with reduced training data (TDS ≤ 40 scans) across all models. Future work will focus on developing a multi-region delineation pipeline for pre-clinical MRI brain data, utilizing the proposed WBD as an initial step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.