Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40543034›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Varieties of Nonreligious Experience: Expanding Understandings of Nonreligious Wellbeing.

Jacqui Frost, Penny Edgell, Mahala Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacqui FrostDepartment of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2481-6294
Penny EdgellDepartment of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Mahala MillerDepartment of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Imagine Fund, University of MinnesotaUniversity of Minnesota, College of Liberal Arts
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religious commitment has long been associated with health and happiness in the United States. However, despite a period of drastic decline in religious affiliation among Americans, much less is known about how nonreligious commitments promote wellbeing. We use novel measures that capture variation among the nonreligious to assess whether aspects of nonreligious experience might replicate religion's health-promoting features. We analyse how wellbeing among the nonreligious is impacted by nonreligious identity (e.g., atheist and agnostic), but also by nonreligious identity duration, involvement in nonreligious organisations and affective orientation to being nonreligious. Using a national survey of Americans (2020), we analyse how these different aspects of nonreligious identity and experience predict three measures of wellbeing: self-reported health, happiness, and life satisfaction. We find that the primary factor predicting wellbeing among the nonreligious is whether they experience their nonreligion as comforting or anxiety-producing (affective orientation), and our findings suggest that whether nonreligious people find comfort or anxiety in their nonreligion changes over time and is shaped by their participation in nonreligious organisations. We discuss the implications of our findings for scholarship on religion and wellbeing as well as for future research on variation in wellbeing among nonreligious Americans.

Indexed as

HappinessPersonal SatisfactionReligionAdultAgedFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40543034
PMCPMC12182266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.