ArticleSociology of health & illness2025
Varieties of Nonreligious Experience: Expanding Understandings of Nonreligious Wellbeing.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Religious commitment has long been associated with health and happiness in the United States. However, despite a period of drastic decline in religious affiliation among Americans, much less is known about how nonreligious commitments promote wellbeing. We use novel measures that capture variation among the nonreligious to assess whether aspects of nonreligious experience might replicate religion's health-promoting features. We analyse how wellbeing among the nonreligious is impacted by nonreligious identity (e.g., atheist and agnostic), but also by nonreligious identity duration, involvement in nonreligious organisations and affective orientation to being nonreligious. Using a national survey of Americans (2020), we analyse how these different aspects of nonreligious identity and experience predict three measures of wellbeing: self-reported health, happiness, and life satisfaction. We find that the primary factor predicting wellbeing among the nonreligious is whether they experience their nonreligion as comforting or anxiety-producing (affective orientation), and our findings suggest that whether nonreligious people find comfort or anxiety in their nonreligion changes over time and is shaped by their participation in nonreligious organisations. We discuss the implications of our findings for scholarship on religion and wellbeing as well as for future research on variation in wellbeing among nonreligious Americans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.