Automatic detection of hippocampal sclerosis in patients with epilepsy.

objectiveThis study was undertaken to develop and validate an automatic, artificial intelligence-enhanced software tool for hippocampal sclerosis (HS) detection, using a variety of standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols from different MRI scanners for routine clinical practice.

methodsFirst, MRI scans of 36 epilepsy patients with unilateral HS and 36 control patients with epilepsy of other etiologies were analyzed. MRI features, including hippocampal subfield volumes from three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) scans and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) intensities, were calculated. Hippocampal subfield volumes were corrected for total brain volume and z-scored using a dataset of 256 healthy controls. Hippocampal subfield FLAIR intensities were z-scored in relation to each subject's mean cortical FLAIR signal. Additionally, left-right ratios of FLAIR intensities and volume features were obtained. Support vector classifiers were trained on the above features to predict HS presence and laterality. In a second step, the algorithm was validated using two independent, external cohorts, including 118 patients and 116 controls in sum, scanned with different MRI scanners and acquisition protocols.

resultsClassifiers demonstrated high accuracy in HS detection and lateralization, with slight variations depending on the input image availability. The best cross-validation accuracy was achieved using both 3D MPRAGE and 3D FLAIR scans (mean accuracy = 1.0, confidence interval [CI] = .939-1.0). External validation of trained classifiers in two independent cohorts yielded accuracies of .951 (CI = .902-.980) and .889 (CI = .805-.945), respectively. In both validation cohorts, the additional use of FLAIR scans led to significantly better classification performance than the use of MPRAGE data alone (p = .016 and p = .031, respectively). A further model was trained on both validation cohorts and tested on the former training cohort, providing additional evidence for good validation performance. Comparison to a previously published algorithm showed no significant difference in performance (p = 1). SIGNIFICANCE: The method presented achieves accurate automated HS detection using standard clinical MRI protocols. It is robust and flexible and requires no image processing expertise.