SynthesisDysphagia2026
Risk Factors for Postoperative Dysphagia in Patients with Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was aimed at determining the risk factors for postoperative dysphagia, a common complication, in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, SinoMed, and Weipu were searched up to July 9, 2023, for cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies on postoperative dysphagia-associated factors in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Two researchers independently screened the articles. Twenty-one studies involving 3352 patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers were included. The relationship between postoperative dysphagia and 22 factors was analyzed. Nine of these were considered as definite or possible risk factors, including age of ≥ 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.161, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.334-7.493), poor preoperative swallowing (OR = 2.618, 95% CI: 1.733-3.955), comorbidities (OR = 2.636, 95% CI: 1.556-4.467), stage T3 or T4 disease (OR = 2.864, 95% CI: 1.130-7.256), tumor in the oropharynx (OR = 1.890, 95% CI: 1.019-3.504), tongue base resection of ≥ 50% (OR = 6.092, 95% CI: 1.429-25.975), subtotal or total glossectomy (OR = 3.433, 95% CI: 1.407-8.376), extent of resection of the mouth floor (OR = 1.457, 95% CI: 1.089-1.949), and postoperative radiotherapy (OR = 2.247, 95% CI: 1.035-4.878). Nine risk factors for postoperative dysphagia in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers were identified. Early identification of these risk factors can provide a basis for identifying and managing postoperative dysphagia in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40542856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.