ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Comparison of early postnatal hemodynamics in neonates born at high-altitude or low-altitude using USCOM: a pilot study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study's purpose is to compare early postnatal hemodynamics between neonates from high- and low-altitude regions using Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) measurements. We prospectively enrolled hemodynamically stable neonates from Shanghai Children's Hospital (low-altitude group, sea level) and People's Hospital of Shigatse City (high-altitude group, 3850 m) between January and June 2024. Hemodynamic parameters derived from USCOM and clinical data (including oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, and hemoglobin levels) were obtained on postnatal day 7. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to compare the differences between groups. The analysis included 80 neonates (40 per group) with comparable baseline characteristics, including gender, gestational age, weight, length, hemoglobin, oxygen carrying capacity, heart rate, and diastolic and mean blood pressure (p > 0.05). Compared to low-altitude group, high-altitude group demonstrated significantly higher stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), Smith-Madigan inotropy index (SMII), and systolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that preterm infants in the high-altitude group showed increased SVI, CO, CI, and SMII with lower systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (p < 0.05), whereas term infants in the group exhibited elevated CI, SMII, and systolic and mean blood pressure, compared to infants in the low-altitude group, respectively (p < 0.05).
conclusionNeonates born at high altitude may maintain circulatory adaptation through enhanced myocardial contractility and cardiac performance, while the compensatory responses seem to differ between preterm infants (Frank-Starling mechanism) and term infants (sympathetic-driven regulation). WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neonates born at high altitude demonstrate lower SpO2 and cardiovascular adaptations to hypobaric hypoxia. • While USCOM enables non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in neonates, physiological differences at different altitude levels may affect the interpretation of USCOM measurements. WHAT IS NEW: • First USCOM-derived comparison reveals elevated cardiac efficiency (higher SVI, CI, and SMII) in neonates born at high-altitude. • The compensatory mechanisms for hypobaric hypoxia differed according to cardiovascular maturity: preterm infants relied on the Frank-Starling mechanism, whereas term infants exhibited sympathetic activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.