Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542849›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025

Management dilemma in choosing evolving treatments in neutropenic septic shock.

H David Humes, Kera Luckritz, Stephen Gorga, Katie Plomaritas, Sara Hoatlin, Michael Humes, Lenar Yessayan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H David HumesDepartment of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. dhumes@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4309-1614
Kera LuckritzDepartment of Pediatrics (Nephrology), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stephen GorgaDepartment of Pediatrics (Critical Care), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Katie PlomaritasClinical Nursing Service (Pediatrics), C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sara HoatlinClinical Nursing Service (Pediatrics), C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael HumesInnovative Biotherapies, Ann Arbor, MI , USA.
Lenar YessayanDepartment of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does a physician decide to use a recently FDA-approved life-saving device in a desperately ill child in which little prior clinical experience is available? This report presents a pediatric patient with neutropenic septic shock and multiorgan failure (MOF) with a 95% chance of death and the availability of a therapeutic device with a completely new approach to treat sepsis. This device, called the selective cytopheretic device (SCD), is a first-in-class autologous immune cell directed therapy. The SCD, when integrated into an extracorporeal blood circuit, has been shown to bind activated neutrophils and monocytes. With a simple pharmacologic maneuver within the device, the bound cells in real time are immunomodulated from a highly pro-inflammatory state to a less inflammatory phenotype. These transformed cells are then released back into the systemic circulation thereby tempering the systemic hyperinflammatory disorder. Since this cell directed therapy focuses on neutrophils, the processing of these cells in a neutropenic state may be a substantive risk resulting in further immunosuppression. On the other hand, the immunomodulation of the circulating neutrophils and monocytes, although sparse, may be beneficial to disrupt the dysregulated inflammatory state responsible for ongoing tissue damage and organ dysfunction. Prior clinical SCD trials excluded patients with neutropenia so that no prior clinical experience was available to make a difficult decision. This report presents the way the medical team approached these issues and made a therapeutic plan that resulted in a positive clinical outcome for the patient.

Indexed as

Multiple Organ FailureNeutropeniaShock, SepticChildHumansMaleMonocytesNeutrophilsExtracorporeal deviceImmunomodulationNeutropeniaNeutrophilsSepsisShock

Identifiers

PMID40542849
PMCPMC12484358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.