ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
The intrathecal morphine analgesia for full endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a prospective dose-finding study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background contextAnesthesia for full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD), typically administered locally or regionally, often fails to provide adequate analgesia, necessitating additional analgesics or even sedation. Our previous work has shown that intrathecal morphine (ITM) administration is considered an effective adjuvant approach for managing peri-operative pain for FELD, but the adverse events (AEs) for ITM remain concerns. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effective dose of intrathecal morphine required to eliminate intraoperative pain in 90% of patients (ED STUDY
designA prospective, double-blind, sequential allocation dose-finding study was conducted using the biased coin up-down method. Patients undergoing single-segment FELD received ITM through the same route as spinal anesthesia. The ITM dose was adjusted using a 1/9 probability of dose reduction following an effective response, or increased for the subsequent patient if the response was ineffective. Sample size for drug dose-finding studies typically ranges between 20 and 40 participants; this study included 30 participants. OUTCOME MEASURES: The ED
methodsAll patients underwent single-segment interlaminar or transforaminal FELD under spinal anesthesia. The ITM dosage range was established at 25, 50, 75, and 100 µg. An effective response was defined as an intraoperative VAS score of 0 with no need for additional analgesics. The dose was adjusted using a biased coin up-down method, with a 1/9 probability of dose reduction after an effective response. If an ineffective response occurred-defined as an intraoperative VAS score > 0 or the requirement for supplemental analgesics-the ITM dose was upgraded for the next patient. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200067060).
resultsThirty patients were enrolled and completed the study between November 2022 and August 2024. The ED
conclusionITM provides effective intraoperative analgesia for FELD. Although decreasing the ITM dose seems to lessen the likelihood of AEs such as pruritus and may hasten the resolution of the side effects, the findings suggest that an approximate dose of 90.89 µg ITM may be optimal for achieving effective intraoperative pain control in most patients. Despite observing a correlation between ITM dose and morphine-related adverse events, more investigation is crucial to accurately establish the safest and most effective dosage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40542834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.