ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of Plate-Based Digital PCR Assays for Simultaneous Quantitation of Hepatitis B and D Viral Loads in Patients' Serum.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plate-based digital PCR assays that will accurately and sensitively measure HBV and HDV viral loads in patients' serum simultaneously.
methodsFirst, we optimized the components and parameters for real-time PCR and RT-PCR assays to measure HBV and HDV levels. Next, we employed identical components and parameters in digital PCR and digital RT-PCR assays. Subsequently, we evaluated the accuracy and sensitivity of these assays compared to established techniques and assessed their efficacy by analyzing different serum samples.
resultsThe technical sensitivity of the optimized digital PCR procedures was 1-5 copies/reaction for both HBV and HDV. Compared to real-time PCR and real-time RT-PCR assays, HBV and HDV quantitative digital PCR assays demonstrated strong correlation coefficients (R2HBV = 0.944 and R2HDV = 0.900). Substantial levels of agreement were indicated by Lin's Concordance Coefficient (CCCHBV = 0.963 and CCCHDV = 0.933). In addition, 2% (2/98) of the clinical samples had low HBV concentrations that the digital PCR could identify but not the real-time PCR. The HDV prevalence found in the study was 3.1% (3/98) by real-time PCR but 5.1% (5/98) by digital PCR.
conclusionIn summary, the optimized digital PCR assays successfully measured hepatitis B and hepatitis D viruses in serum samples with low viral loads that real-time PCR assays could not detect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.