Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542644›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2025

Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definition, development, implementation and outcomes of pre-operative surgery schools.

Imogen Fecher-Jones, Ben Ainsworth, Tong J Gan, S Ramani Moonesinghe, Andrew D Shaw, Michael P W Grocott, Denny Z H Levett, Perioperative Quality Initiative Surgery School Consensus Group

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Imogen Fecher-JonesDepartment of Perioperative Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0214-7981
Ben AinsworthSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tong J GanDivision of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
S Ramani MoonesingheNIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Andrew D ShawDepartment of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael P W GrocottNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Denny Z H LevettNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Perioperative Quality Initiative Surgery School Consensus Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-operative group sessions incorporating patient education and behaviour change interventions, known as 'surgery schools', are becoming increasingly common before major elective surgery across the world. However, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgery schools, and the development and delivery of these complex interventions lacks standardisation.

methodsIn collaboration with the Perioperative Quality Initiative, we aimed to develop evidence- and expertise-based consensus statements and recommendations regarding the definition, design, content, and outcomes of surgery schools. Thirty-two international multidisciplinary experts in surgery school and pre-operative preparation attended a series of virtual meetings based on a modified Delphi methodology. A systematic review and additional targeted literature searches were used to propose statements for the definition, design, content and outcomes of surgery schools. Statements and recommendations were discussed iteratively and refined in multiple rounds, until agreement was reached.

resultsConsensus was reached on a definition of surgery school, as well as three statements and 18 recommendations in relation to: scope; outcomes; intervention development; delivery; inclusivity; and educational content of surgery schools. Seventeen areas were highlighted as priorities for future research. DISCUSSION: These consensus statements and recommendations are intended to help clinicians and service managers who plan to develop and implement surgery schools. They may improve the quality of those programmes and help to standardise their content. We also hope that this work will influence government strategy and policy in relation to the design, delivery and funding of peri-operative optimisation pathways.

Indexed as

Perioperative CarePreoperative CareDelphi TechniqueHumansPatient Education as TopicDelphi consensusperi‐operative medicinepre‐operative educationsurgery school, prehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40542644
PMCPMC12351224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.