Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542627›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2025

Resilience in advanced cancer patients who obtain a long-term response to immunotherapy or targeted therapy: an Ecological Momentary Assessment study.

Laura C Zwanenburg, Eeske van Roekel, Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk, José J Koldenhof, Olga C J Schuurbiers-Siebers, Janneke van der Stap, Marije L van der Lee, Melanie P J Schellekens

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura C ZwanenburgTilburg University School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6837-2538
Eeske van RoekelTilburg University School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0829-8089
Karijn P M SuijkerbuijkUniversity Medical Centre in Utrecht, Department of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-5430
José J KoldenhofUniversity Medical Centre in Utrecht, Department of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4205-6611
Olga C J Schuurbiers-SiebersRadboud University Medical Centre, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Janneke van der StapUniversity Medical Centre in Utrecht, Department of Lung Diseases, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marije L van der LeeTilburg University School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1316-7008
Melanie P J SchellekensTilburg University School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8397-7674

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society 12932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately half of advanced cancer patients with a long-term response to immuno- or targeted therapy (IT/TT) (ie, long-term responders (LTRs)) experience heightened distress due to persistent uncertainty. PURPOSE: We aimed to study to what extent supportive factors (ie, illness acceptance, tolerance of uncertainty, mindfulness, social support, optimism, emotion regulation variability, and positive affect in general and prior to a stressor) predict micro-level resilience in response to unpleasant daily life events.

methodsWe conducted an observational cohort study with a baseline assessment of supportive factors, followed by Ecological Momentary Assessment with 8 assessments a day for 14 consecutive days. Resilience was operationalized as maintenance of low negative affect (NA) or a smaller increase in NA to an unpleasant event, as this suggests that partial recovery has already taken place. We used Dynamic Structural Equation Models to study supportive factors of resilience.

resultsWe included data from 61 patients with advanced melanoma or lung cancer with confirmed response to or long-term stable disease while on IT/TT. More unpleasant daily life events were associated with increases in NA. The multivariate model did not identify any supportive factors. Exploratory analysis using separate models tentatively indicated that LTRs with higher levels of illness acceptance, mindfulness, optimism, and general positive affect showed a smaller increase in NA in response to an unpleasant event (ie, more resilient response).

conclusionsPreliminary findings suggest that illness acceptance, mindfulness, optimism, and general positive affect are supportive factors of resilience in LTRs. Future research should include these factors at momentary level to enhance insight into the resilience process.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsMelanomaResilience, PsychologicalAdultAffectAgedCohort StudiesEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMindfulnessNeoplasmsOptimismecological momentary assessmentimmunotherapylung cancermelanomaresiliencetargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID40542627
PMCPMC12204756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.