ReviewDiabetes care2026
How to Fix a Broken Health Care System: Pathways to Maximize Health and Well-being for All.
Review in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alternative Payment Models and Diabetes Outcomes.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
- A Tale of Two Conditions: 50 Years of Chronic Illness and Cancer From a Nursing Perspective.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Addressing Structural and Systemic Racism in Social and Health Care Systems to Advance Health Equity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The U.S. health care system is broken, with particularly low performance for health outcomes, access to care, equity, and administrative efficiency in comparison with other high-income countries, despite high cost. By virtue of the many elements required for optimal care, the poor diabetes care quality and outcome metrics of the U.S. are canaries in the coal mine for the health care system. The fundamental problem with the U.S. health care system is that it does not prioritize the long-term health and well-being of all individuals and communities. Three intertwined elements are foundational for an understanding of why the U.S. health care system is built the way it is and what changes are necessary to improve it: 1) ethics and culture; 2) political economy, the underlying political and economic structures that shape our nation and thus our health system; and 3) the definition and measurement of value in health care. This article recommends that health care policies around health insurance and payment be designed to support, incentivize, and sustain effective population health models that address medical, social, psychological, and behavioral needs of all individuals and communities. Good governance is essential to assure that payer and provider market incentives are explicitly aligned to prioritize the health and well-being of individuals and communities and cost-effectiveness of care, beyond short-term financial gain for health care systems and investors. Equitable access allows for health care resource distribution according to need, enabling all individuals to have a fair and just opportunity for health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.