Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542571›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Routine 36-week scan: prediction of prolonged neonatal intensive care unit admission.

A Arechvo, E Demertzidou, S Adjahou, A Syngelaki, L A Magee, P von Dadelszen, K H Nicolaides, R Akolekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A ArechvoFetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
E DemertzidouFetal Medicine Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8554-571X
S AdjahouFetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
A SyngelakiFetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5856-6072
L A MageeInstitute of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1355-610X
P von DadelszenInstitute of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
K H NicolaidesFetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-0711
R AkolekarFetal Medicine Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-5442

Funding

Fetal Medicine Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the contribution of maternal demographic characteristics and elements of medical history to the prediction of prolonged (> 2 days) neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission for high-dependency or intensive care, and to investigate the added value to such prediction of the findings from the 36-week ultrasound scan and data from labor and delivery.

methodsWe included 107 762 women with a singleton pregnancy who had undergone a routine ultrasound examination at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Assessment included medical history, estimated fetal weight (EFW), and Doppler measurements of uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI), umbilical artery (UA) PI and fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent contributions to prolonged NICU admission of maternal factors (demographic and pregnancy characteristics), findings from the 36-week scan, and data from labor and delivery. Detection rates (DRs) and areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUCs) for prolonged NICU admission were compared.

resultsOverall, 946 (0.88%) neonates required prolonged NICU admission. The maternal factors that significantly contributed to prediction of prolonged NICU admission were body mass index, social deprivation, conception via in-vitro fertilization, chronic hypertension, Type-1 diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus. Screening by maternal factors provided a DR of 20.7% at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 10% (AUC, 0.606 (95% CI, 0.587-0.625)). Significant predictors from the 36-week scan included deepest vertical pocket of amniotic fluid < 2 cm and ≥ 8 cm, UA-PI >95

conclusionsMaternal factors (particularly social deprivation), 36-week scan findings, and data from labor and delivery each make an independent contribution to the risk of prolonged NICU admission at term. Nevertheless, more than 40% of these admissions are not predictable prior to labor and birth. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle Cerebral ArteryPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPulsatile FlowROC CurveUmbilical ArteriesUterine Arteryadverse perinatal outcomeDoppler ultrasoundestimated fetal weightfetal biometryneonatal intensive care unit admissionpyramid of pregnancy carethird‐trimester screening

Identifiers

PMID40542571
PMCPMC12401497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.