Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542567›Full record

ReviewPaediatric anaesthesia2025

Propofol: A Medication That Changed Pediatric Anesthesia Practice.

Brian J Anderson, L Ignacio Cortinez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Individualising drug therapy in intensive care.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian J AndersonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2826-3019
L Ignacio CortinezDivisión Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-8544-8768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of propofol changed our understanding of pediatric anesthesia pharmacology, research approaches for intravenous drug study, and led to infusion pump development for the maintenance phase of anesthesia. The story of propofol development provides a blueprint for other intravenous drug development. The introduction of the target concentration strategy based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and covariate understanding is central to total intravenous anesthesia techniques and is best exemplified by propofol. While use of the EEG to gauge depth of anesthesia preceded the propofol era, processed EEG signals enabled description of the relationship between propofol plasma concentration and effect, advancing propofol use and safety. Clinical need drove the characterization of propofol pharmacokinetics and concentration effect relationships in children. Subsequently, study in populations such as neonates, the critically ill, and children with obesity explored covariate influences. Target-controlled infusions also required an appreciation of effect site concentrations and time delays, and drug interactions such as those between propofol and opioids. Supraglottic airway use in children paralleled propofol use because greater depression of pharyngeal and laryngeal reactivity was noted with propofol than seen than with thiopental. Environmental concerns with the carbon footprint of inhalational agents may yet see infusions assume dominance for maintenance anesthesia.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthetics, IntravenousPediatricsPropofolAnesthesia, IntravenousChildHumansInfant, NewbornPediatric AnesthesiaAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolanesthesiaintravenouspediatricspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticspropofoltarget‐controlled infusionTIVA

Identifiers

PMID40542567
PMCPMC12340365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.