Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542538›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2025

Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Shigekazu Kitamura, Yasuhiko Matsumori, Toshimasa Yamamoto, Tomofumi Ishikawa, Yuko Hoshino, Hiroki Yoshimatsu, Alexandra Thiry, Akio Arakawa, Robert Croop, Terence Fullerton and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05399485 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for Migraine Prevention in Japanese Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05399485 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for Migraine Prevention in Japanese Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2022 to 2024Enrolled496ConditionsMigraineArmsRimegepant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shigekazu KitamuraDepartment of Neurology, Konan Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Yasuhiko MatsumoriSendai Headache and Neurology Clinic, Miyagi, Japan.
Toshimasa YamamotoDepartment of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Tomofumi IshikawaPfizer R&D Japan, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-368X
Yuko HoshinoPfizer R&D Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki YoshimatsuPfizer R&D Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Alexandra ThiryPfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Akio ArakawaPfizer R&D Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Robert CroopBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Terence FullertonPfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Fumihiko SakaiSaitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Takao TakeshimaHeadache Center, Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Biohaven PharmaceuticalsPfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/

backgroundThis study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist rimegepant relative to placebo as a preventive treatment for migraine in Japan. This was the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine to be conducted outside the United States and the second conducted globally.

methodsIn this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, conducted August 9, 2022 through January 18, 2024, adults in Japan with a history of 4-18 migraine attacks/month of moderate or severe pain intensity completed a 28-day observation phase and then took rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was the mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase. Safety was assessed based on the frequency of adverse events and laboratory test abnormalities during the double-blind treatment phase.

resultsA total of 484 (efficacy) and 496 (safety) treated participants were evaluable. During the observation phase, participants in the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, reported a mean (SD) of 9.3 (3.1) and 9.0 (3.1) monthly migraine days. The study met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant difference in mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase (difference rimegepant vs. placebo: -1.1 [95% confidence interval = -1.73 to -0.38], p = 0.002). In the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, 54.7% and 41.0% of participants reported adverse events and 0.8% and 0.4% reported serious adverse events during the double-blind treatment phase. No signal of drug-induced liver injury due to rimegepant was identified.

conclusionRimegepant 75 mg every other day demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo for the preventive treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile. NCT05399485. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study tested the effectiveness of rimegepant for migraine prevention in Japan. Results showed that rimegepant was more effective than placebo in reducing monthly migraine days, with very few adverse effects. These results support the previous findings from a clinical study conducted in the United States and broaden them to a wider population.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersPiperidinesPyridinesAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsPiperidinesPyridinesrimegepant sulfatecalcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonistheadachemigrainepainpreventive treatmentrimegepant

Identifiers

PMID40542538
PMCPMC12455392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.