Trial reportHeadache2025
Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05399485 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for Migraine Prevention in Japanese Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for Migraine Prevention in Japanese Subjects
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for acute and preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant Every Other Day as Preventive Treatment for Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term safety and effectiveness of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: an open-label extension of a phase 3 study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- A phase 4, 24-week, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of once-daily dosing of 75 mg rimegepant for episodic migraine prevention.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.Headache · 2025Trial
- Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Rimegepant as Second- or Third-Line Acute Treatment for Migraine: A Prospective Observational Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences Toward CGRP-Targeting Preventive Migraine Treatments in Japan: Discrete Choice Experiment.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Post Hoc Analysis of Time to First and Sustained Improvement in Weekly Migraine Days Among Patients Receiving Preventive Treatment With Rimegepant 75 mg.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- The efficacy of rimegepant for the acute treatment of vestibular migraine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Through 64 Weeks' Rimegepant Treatment for Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Short-term prevention of perimenstrual migraine with rimegepant.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/
backgroundThis study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist rimegepant relative to placebo as a preventive treatment for migraine in Japan. This was the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine to be conducted outside the United States and the second conducted globally.
methodsIn this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, conducted August 9, 2022 through January 18, 2024, adults in Japan with a history of 4-18 migraine attacks/month of moderate or severe pain intensity completed a 28-day observation phase and then took rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was the mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase. Safety was assessed based on the frequency of adverse events and laboratory test abnormalities during the double-blind treatment phase.
resultsA total of 484 (efficacy) and 496 (safety) treated participants were evaluable. During the observation phase, participants in the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, reported a mean (SD) of 9.3 (3.1) and 9.0 (3.1) monthly migraine days. The study met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant difference in mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase (difference rimegepant vs. placebo: -1.1 [95% confidence interval = -1.73 to -0.38], p = 0.002). In the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, 54.7% and 41.0% of participants reported adverse events and 0.8% and 0.4% reported serious adverse events during the double-blind treatment phase. No signal of drug-induced liver injury due to rimegepant was identified.
conclusionRimegepant 75 mg every other day demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo for the preventive treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile. NCT05399485. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study tested the effectiveness of rimegepant for migraine prevention in Japan. Results showed that rimegepant was more effective than placebo in reducing monthly migraine days, with very few adverse effects. These results support the previous findings from a clinical study conducted in the United States and broaden them to a wider population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.