ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2025
A visual monitoring DNA-free multi-gene editing system excised via LoxP::FRT/FLP in poplar.
Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A RUBY-Based Visual Hairy Root Transformation and CRISPR-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Gene Knockouts to Genome Remodeling: Large DNA Fragment Deletion Technologies in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing nitrogen use efficiency in forest plantations: mechanistic insights fromForestry research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as a potent molecular scalpel for precise genome editing, and profoundly revolutionized plant genetics and breeding, facilitating the development of innovative and improved plant varieties. Typically, the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing construct is delivered into target organisms via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation or biolistic methods. However, the incorporation of the CRISPR-Cas9 machinery increases the risk of off-target effects, causing unintended genomic alterations. Additionally, the introduction of exogenous DNA sequences, such as antibiotic resistance marker, raises public concerns regarding the biosafety and regulatory oversight of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), potentially hindering regulatory approval and commercialization. Here, we have engineered an integrated system comprising RUBY, LoxP::FRT/FLP and CRISPR/Cas9-sgRNA cassettes within a single construct, allowing visible color monitoring throughout process including genetic transform, positive transgenic and edited events screening, as well as exogenous DNA excision events, we refer to it as 'a visual monitoring DNA-free multi-gene editing system (VMDFGE)'. This system was introduced into poplar through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation, yielding transgenic poplars with a 75.0% visual screening rate, a 45.8% targeted mutation rate and a 54.5% excision rate for the entire integration system. This approach eliminates the concerns associated with off-target effects and GMO regulatory challenges. It offers significant potential for improvement of poplar, other woody plants and crop species while removing the foreign DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.