Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542534›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2025

A visual monitoring DNA-free multi-gene editing system excised via LoxP::FRT/FLP in poplar.

Ruqian Wu, Yinghui Chai, Ying Li, Tingting Chen, Wanxin Qi, Yinxuan Xue, Hailin Lu, Zhong Chen, Bin Guo, Shanwen Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ruqian WuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Yinghui ChaiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Ying LiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Tingting ChenState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Wanxin QiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Yinxuan XueState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Hailin LuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Zhong ChenState Key Laboratory for Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Key Laboratory of Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, National Energy R&D Center for Non-Food Biomass, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Bin GuoShanxi Academy of Forestry, Taiyuan, China.
Shanwen LiShandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, China.
Debin QinState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9235-7879
Xinmin AnState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-1753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as a potent molecular scalpel for precise genome editing, and profoundly revolutionized plant genetics and breeding, facilitating the development of innovative and improved plant varieties. Typically, the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing construct is delivered into target organisms via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation or biolistic methods. However, the incorporation of the CRISPR-Cas9 machinery increases the risk of off-target effects, causing unintended genomic alterations. Additionally, the introduction of exogenous DNA sequences, such as antibiotic resistance marker, raises public concerns regarding the biosafety and regulatory oversight of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), potentially hindering regulatory approval and commercialization. Here, we have engineered an integrated system comprising RUBY, LoxP::FRT/FLP and CRISPR/Cas9-sgRNA cassettes within a single construct, allowing visible color monitoring throughout process including genetic transform, positive transgenic and edited events screening, as well as exogenous DNA excision events, we refer to it as 'a visual monitoring DNA-free multi-gene editing system (VMDFGE)'. This system was introduced into poplar through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation, yielding transgenic poplars with a 75.0% visual screening rate, a 45.8% targeted mutation rate and a 54.5% excision rate for the entire integration system. This approach eliminates the concerns associated with off-target effects and GMO regulatory challenges. It offers significant potential for improvement of poplar, other woody plants and crop species while removing the foreign DNA.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPopulusAgrobacterium tumefaciensPlants, Genetically ModifiedDNA‐freeLoxP::FRT/FLP recombinase systemmulti‐gene editingpoplarvisual monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40542534
PMCPMC12392973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.