Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542393›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

Could a feedback device help manage work-related shoulder disorders?: protocol of a mixed methods pilot study.

Philippe Meidinger, Quan Nha Hong, Jean Tittley, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, Jean-Sébastien Roy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06693479 (Could a Feedback Device Help Manage Work-related Shoulder Disorders? - Protocol of a Mixed Methods Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06693479 narecruitingnot on this map

Could a Feedback Device Help Manage Work-related Shoulder Disorders? - Protocol of a Mixed Methods Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsRotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain, Shoulder Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)ArmsShoulder watch load (SWL) feedback, Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philippe MeidingerCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), CIUSSS de La Capitale-Nationale, 525 Blvd Wilfrid-Hamel, Office H- 1710, Quebec City, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7243-3839
Quan Nha HongSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Succursale Centre-Ville, C.P. 6128, Montréal, QC, H3 C 3 J7, Canada.
Jean TittleyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), CIUSSS de La Capitale-Nationale, 525 Blvd Wilfrid-Hamel, Office H- 1710, Quebec City, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.
Alexandre Campeau-LecoursSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Jean-Sébastien RoyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), CIUSSS de La Capitale-Nationale, 525 Blvd Wilfrid-Hamel, Office H- 1710, Quebec City, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada. jean-sebastien.roy@fmed.ulaval.ca.

Funding

Arthritis Society IIG-22-0000000127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork-related shoulder disorders (WRSDs) significantly impact workers' health and well-being. Various factors contribute to WRSDs, including work environment, physical workload, psychological stressors, and an aging workforce. Despite numerous interventions proposed to address WRSDs, finding high-quality evidence to support any of them remains challenging. One potential reason is the lack of valid tools to measure physical workload and customize interventions. To address this, we developed a portable feedback system, the ShoulderWatchLoad (SWL), designed to estimate physical work demands on the shoulder. The objectives of this pilot study are (a) to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the SWL in the workplace and conducting a large-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) by assessing recruitment success, intervention adherence, usability of the technology, and the research team's capacity to refine the SWL and (b) to explore the SWL capacity to reduce disability, pain, work limitations, and physical work demands while increasing pain self-efficacy among workers with WRSDs. METHODS/

designA convergent mixed methods pilot study will be conducted. The quantitative component will consist of a two-arm parallel group external pilot RCT involving 42 participants with WRSDs who will be randomized into one of the two study groups. Following baseline evaluation, all participants will attend an education session in the workplace. Following this session, participants of the experimental group will receive a 2-week workplace intervention using feedback from the SWL, while participants in the control group will not receive this intervention. All participants will undergo four evaluations over a 12-week period (baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th weeks). The qualitative component will be a interpretative descriptive qualitative study involving three focus groups with 21 participants from the experimental group. An innovative joint display will be used to represent the integration of qualitative and quantitative data, along with progression criteria, to draw meta-inferences about the feasibility of implementing the SWL in the workplace and conducting a full-scale RCT in the future. DISCUSSION: A holistic approach combining qualitative and quantitative elements will enable us to determine the SWL usability and whether the conduct of a full RCT is feasible.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06693479.

Indexed as

DeviceFeasibilityFeedbackFocus groupMixed methods studyPilotRandomized controlled trialShoulder painTechnologyWorkers

Identifiers

PMID40542393
PMCPMC12180215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.