ReviewJournal of medical case reports2025
Diagnosis of congenital ectopia lentis: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCongenital ectopia lentis (CEL) is a rare ophthalmic disorder characterized by partial or complete dislocation of the lens, leading to significant visual impairment. The etiology is complex, often involving genetic factors and systemic diseases. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent complications and preserve the patient's vision. CASE PRESENTATION: This report presents a case of a 7-year-and-6-month-old Chinese male patient with congenital ectopia lentis. The patient had a history of high myopia from an early age and poor corrected vision. Diagnostic evaluations included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, biometry, retinal OCT, corneal thickness measurement, corneal topography, and ultrasound examinations. Additionally, whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed to identify gene mutations potentially linked to the clinical manifestations. Imaging studies revealed bilateral lens dislocation accompanied by corneal astigmatism and vitreous opacities. Genetic testing detected a known pathogenic missense mutation (c.3209G > A) in the FBN1 gene, associated with Marfan syndrome. A variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the COL2A1 gene, potentially related to Stickler syndrome, was also identified.
conclusionThe diagnosis of congenital ectopia lentis can be confirmed through a combination of imaging studies and genetic testing, particularly when associated with systemic diseases. Imaging techniques help determine the extent of lens dislocation and related complications, while genetic testing provides critical insights into the underlying genetic causes. Early diagnosis and intervention are essential to reduce the risk of complications and improve patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.