Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542353›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Preoperative embolization of head and neck tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhen Long, Yu-Hui Su, Jing-Bin Zhu, Qi-Sen Yao, Zhen Feng, Peng-Yu Chen, Yuan-Feng Liang, Fu Zhu, Yu Ning

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhen LongDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Yu-Hui SuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530000, Guangxi, China.
Jing-Bin ZhuDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Qi-Sen YaoDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Zhen FengDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Peng-Yu ChenDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Yuan-Feng LiangDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Fu ZhuDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China.
Yu NingDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China. 13481521127@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreoperative embolization is a widely recognized adjunctive treatment for highly vascular head and neck tumors; however, there is still no consensus regarding its efficacy and safety. Our study aims to address this issue through a meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant literature on preoperative embolization for head and neck tumors up to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies involving embolization and non-embolization groups were included. Eligible studies were selected for meta-analysis to estimate intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

resultsA total of 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized controlled trials and 23 cohort studies, encompassing a total of 1,039 patients. Preoperative embolization reduced estimated blood loss. The estimated blood loss was 456 ml in the embolization group compared to 516 ml in the non-embolization group (Standard Mean Difference = -0.67; 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.32; P = 0.0002). Preoperative embolization was associated with increased surgical resection time. The mean resection time was 312 min in the embolization group and 305 min in the non-embolization group (Standard Mean Difference = -0.66; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.12; P = 0.02). Preoperative embolization did not reduce postoperative complications (Odd ratio = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.70; P = 0.90).

conclusionsCompared with surgery without preoperative embolization for head and neck tumors, preoperative embolization appears to reduce intraoperative estimated blood loss and increase surgical resection time; however, it does not significantly reduce incidence of complications.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalEmbolization, TherapeuticHead and Neck NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareHumansOperative TimeEmbolizationHead and neck tumorsMeta-AnalysisOtolaryngologySystematic reviewVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID40542353
PMCPMC12180253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.