ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Pattern of change and predictors of cognitive function in older adults receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using the Montreal cognitive assessment.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting racial disparities in breast cancer: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential of African medicinal plants.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study examined the pattern of change in cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in the context of physical function and identified risk factors for poor cognitive function post allogeneic HCT in adults ≥ 60 years. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a two-center prospective cohort study, measuring cognitive and physical function pre-HCT and 3 months post-HCT. A MoCA score of 26 and above is considered normal. We defined mild impairment as a MoCA score of 23-25, and < 23 as moderate impairment. The Sankey plot was generated to assess the transition of impairment status on the MoCA screen from pre-HCT to 3 months post-HCT. The association of predetermined clinical and demographic variables and 3-month cognitive function and cognitive categories was determined using linear mixed-effects model and ordinal logistic regression, respectively. Predetermined variables including physical function, age, gender, education, depressive symptoms, KPS, HCT-CI, disease type, and treatment intensity were used in multivariate analyses.
resultsA total of 171 participants were identified. Pre-HCT, 84 (49%) had normal MoCA scores, 51 (30%) had mild, and 36 (21%) had moderate impairment scores. The prevalence of post-HCT mild impairment scores decreased, and moderate impairment scores nearly doubled. Female gender and pre-HCT functional mobility impairment predicted performance on the MoCA post-HCT above and beyond pre-HCT depressive symptoms, comorbid conditions, KPS, and transplant-related factors. Pre-HCT MoCA and functional mobility scores also predicted post-HCT cognitive categories (normal, mild and moderate impairment).
conclusionOur findings suggest that the pre-HCT MoCA screen can identify those at risk for cognitive impairment post-HCT and can help monitor cognitive function post-HCT. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Employing the widely used MoCA threshold for impairment (MoCA < 26) could fail to identify a subgroup requiring intervention and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.