ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Visualizing the 'unspeakable': venereal diseases at the 1926 GeSoLei (Great Exhibition for Health Care, Social Welfare, and Physical Exercise)].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The GeSoLei (Great Exhibition for Health Care, Social Welfare, and Physical Exercise) held in Düsseldorf in 1926 was one of the largest exhibitions of the Weimar Republic. At its core was the often visual communication of health-related topics-including the presentation of sexually transmitted diseases. These subjects were conveyed within the complex interplay between medical education, moral normalization, and esthetic staging. The section "Common Diseases, Common Ailments, Common Vices" (Main Section Social Welfare) brought together conditions such as tuberculosis, alcoholism, and syphilis-sicknesses that were not only medically, but also socially and morally charged. Through the use of information boards, wax models (moulages), and interactive exhibits, connections between sexuality, disease, and social responsibility were emphasized. The visual strategy followed a pedagogical and often deterrent approach, which, through standardized forms of representation, enabled communication suited for a mass audience. In addition to the guiding principle of social hygiene, the exhibition also incorporated ideas of racial and hereditary health, placing sexually transmitted diseases within the context of "public health" and "rational population management." However, aspects of sexual diversity or sexology-as advocated by figures like Magnus Hirschfeld-were deliberately excluded. This article analyzes the visual and conceptual presentation of sexually transmitted diseases at GeSoLei as a representative example of the medicalization and moralization of sexuality in the early 20th century-embedded in a complex web of science, society, politics, and aesthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.