ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2025
Antagonistic potential and analytical profiling of plant probiotic bacteria using chromatography and mass spectrometry techniques against Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum.
Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probiotic potential of autochthonous Enterobacter mori ASP8 and Bacillus stercoris ASP10 isolated from gut microbiota of healthy stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant probiotics are bacteria that play a significant role in enhancing plant growth and health. To understand the interactions between plant probiotics and host plants, a comprehensive approach of antagonistic activity and analytical methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography‒mass spectrometry (GC‒MS), and Fourier transform infrared (FT‒IR) spectroscopy, were employed. The previously isolated bacterial strains, namely, Corynebacterium accolens strain CNTC Th1/57, Bacillus rugosus strain SPB7, Lactobacillus pasteurii DSM 23907 and Cytobacillus firmus strain NBRC 15306, were exposed to antagonistic testing against Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum. Considering the results of the antagonistic activity both in vitro and statistically, the bacterial strains Bacillus rugosus strain SPB7 and Lactobacillus pasteurii DSM 23907 presented greater zones of inhibition. Hence these bacteria were moved to obtain comprehensive insights into the chemical composition. HPLC and GC‒MS resulted in the identification of phenols and organic acids. These results were further confirmed by FT-IR, which revealed a peak at 3500 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.