ArticleCommunications biology2025
Molecular features defining the efficiency of bioPROTACs.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic optimization and characterization of the MidTAC platform for targeted protein degradation.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Degrading GPX4 via Biomimetic Nanoparticle-Mediated In Situ Synthesis of Deep-Learning-Designed Binder-Degron Chimeras for Prostate Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- BioPROTACs: a promising approach for targeted protein degradation.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Writing the CRBN degron.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Degradation Rate Assessment of bioPROTACs Based on Peptide Degrons, E3 Domains, Adapters and Conjugated Small Molecules.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BioPROTACs consist of a target-binding unit and a component of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. However, the specific biophysical features influencing their effectiveness are poorly understood. We investigated the design principles defining the target-binding moiety of bioPROTACs. We used our recently developed assay for accurately measuring degradation rates, based on microinjection and live-cell microscopy, independent of other confounding factors like biosynthesis and transport. We used a very efficient UPS interaction domain from CHIP E3 ligase, and 9 different well-characterized DARPins to test degradation of the proof-of-principle target eGFP. All but two DARPins work well in this context, one sterically preventing E2 binding in the complex, the other overlapping with the target ubiquitination epitope. Affinity and thermodynamic stability of the binders had only a modest role. BioPROTACs constructed in this way were able to degrade eGFP catalytically. DARPins by themselves could also accelerate degradation of bound GFP, using other cellular E3 systems, but in a non-catalytic manner. The most important factor for efficient degradation by a bioPROTAC in trans is the correct orientation of the complex for target ubiquitination and presentation to the proteasome, still to be determined empirically. The strategies developed here show an efficient pathway to characterize and optimize such systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.