ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Scleral thickness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Microcirculation at the Optic Nerve Head in Eyes With Keratoconus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvaluation of scleral thickness with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
methodsA total of 30 severe (Group 1), 30 moderate (Group 2) and 30 mild (Group 3) OSAS patients and 22 healthy volunteers (Group 4) were included in the study. Scleral thickness measurements were taken with AS-OCT, 6 mm, 4 mm and 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur, in four gaze positions. Data and findings were examined comparatively.
resultsAt 6 mm posterior to the scleral spur, the mean thickness was found to be significantly higher in all quadrants in Group 1 (p<0.05 for all). Superior thickness was higher in Group 2 compared to Group 4 (p=0.034). At 4 mm posterior to the scleral spur; in Group 1, the mean thickness was found higher than Group 2 and 3 only in the inferior (p=0.01, p=0.021, respectively) and was found higher than Group 4 in the nasal and inferior (p<0.001, p=0.006, respectively). At 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur; significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 only in the inferior (p=0.002), between Groups 1 and 3 in the nasal and inferior (p=0.029, p=0.002), and between Groups 1 and 4 the in nasal and inferior (p=0.002, p<0.001).
conclusionThe scleral thickness measured from 6 mm posterior to the scleral spur was higher in all quadrants in patients with severe OSAS. It is possible that the increase in scleral thickness, especially in severe OSAS, is due to extracellular matrix accumulation in the scleral tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.