Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Increased macular atrophy area with photodynamic therapy over intravitreal aflibercept at 2-year follow-up of pachychoroid neovasculopathy.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pachychoroid-Related Pigment Epithelial Detachment Treated with Photodynamic Therapy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVA) and reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (rfPDT) for pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) over 2 years. STUDY
designObservational, retrospective case series. Single-center study.
methodsThis study involved 36 eyes of 36 patients with PNV. The IVA group comprised 18 eyes treated with IVA monotherapy (injection every 3 months followed by a pro re nata regimen), whereas the rfPDT group consisted of 18 eyes treated with rfPDT monotherapy. Post-treatment changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular atrophy (MA) area, central retinal thickness (CRT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were compared between the 2 groups.
resultsThe IVA group received 8.94 ± 4.77 injections, whereas the rfPDT group received rfPDT 1.06 ± 0.24 times. The logMAR BCVA improved in both groups but did not differ between the 2 groups. The MA area increased from 0.163 ± 0.418 mm
conclusionsThe increase in the MA area and the decrease in the SFCT were greater in the rfPDT group than in the IVA group for PNV, suggesting that IVA may be preferred over rfPDT for PNV treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40542208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.