ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Clinical application of whole exome sequencing (WES) in the genetic diagnosis of 768 Chinese patients with bilateral hearing loss.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights in genetics: from molecular mechanisms to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of exome sequencing in hearing loss: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing loss is a prevalent sensory disability with strong genetic heterogeneity, affecting approximately 60% of patients due to genetic factors. To investigate the possible genetic causes of hearing loss in 768 unrelated Chinese patients and analyze the genetic diagnosis rates among patients with different clinical phenotypic characteristics, 768 patients were enrolled, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for genetic testing. Sanger sequencing, MLPA, or qPCR were used to verify the parental origin of identified variants. We identified possible genetic etiologies in 501 of the 768 patients (65.2%), including 456 with non-syndromic and 45 with syndromic hearing loss. A total of 214 variants from 30 genes were identified: 174 previously reported and 40 novel pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, the 18 hotspot variants accounted for 71.9% of all identified variants. Notably, 15 patients carried de novo variants. The genetic diagnosis rate was significantly higher in patients with severe-profound hearing loss (95.8%, 474/495) compared to those with mild-moderate hearing loss (9.9%, 27/273), P < 0.001. Our findings expand the spectrum of genetic variants associated with hearing loss and demonstrate high genetic diagnosis rates in patients with severe-profound hearing loss and congenital onset. WES combined with parental origin verification is an effective and economical method for identifying the genetic etiology of hearing loss and can be considered a priority in clinical practice for guiding early intervention and preventing further hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.