Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542191›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025

Clinical application of whole exome sequencing (WES) in the genetic diagnosis of 768 Chinese patients with bilateral hearing loss.

Hongfei Kang, Jingjing Li, Huikun Duan, Lisha Su, Yanjie Xia, Zili Li, Xiangdong Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insights in genetics: from molecular mechanisms to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongfei KangGenetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jingjing LiDepartment of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Huikun DuanGenetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lisha SuGenetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yanjie XiaGenetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zili LiGenetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiangdong KongGenetic and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. kongxd@263.net.ORCID 0000-0003-0030-7638

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (Henan Province Natural Science Foundation) 232300420230,242300420392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss is a prevalent sensory disability with strong genetic heterogeneity, affecting approximately 60% of patients due to genetic factors. To investigate the possible genetic causes of hearing loss in 768 unrelated Chinese patients and analyze the genetic diagnosis rates among patients with different clinical phenotypic characteristics, 768 patients were enrolled, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for genetic testing. Sanger sequencing, MLPA, or qPCR were used to verify the parental origin of identified variants. We identified possible genetic etiologies in 501 of the 768 patients (65.2%), including 456 with non-syndromic and 45 with syndromic hearing loss. A total of 214 variants from 30 genes were identified: 174 previously reported and 40 novel pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, the 18 hotspot variants accounted for 71.9% of all identified variants. Notably, 15 patients carried de novo variants. The genetic diagnosis rate was significantly higher in patients with severe-profound hearing loss (95.8%, 474/495) compared to those with mild-moderate hearing loss (9.9%, 27/273), P < 0.001. Our findings expand the spectrum of genetic variants associated with hearing loss and demonstrate high genetic diagnosis rates in patients with severe-profound hearing loss and congenital onset. WES combined with parental origin verification is an effective and economical method for identifying the genetic etiology of hearing loss and can be considered a priority in clinical practice for guiding early intervention and preventing further hearing loss.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingGenetic TestingHearing Loss, BilateralAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40542191
PMCPMC12583817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.