ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
Leveraging viral genome sequences and machine learning models for identification of potentially selective antiviral agents.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drugs against broad-spectrum of coronaviruses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral genome sequencing provides valuable information for antiviral development, yet its integration with machine learning for virtual screening remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, viral genome sequences were combined with structural data of approved and investigational antivirals to identify virus-selective agents. In parallel, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were built to predict pan-antivirals. Robust models were generated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) >0.72 for virus-selective and >0.79 for pan-antiviral predictions. These models were applied to virtually screen ~360 K compounds for anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. The 346 compounds identified by the models were tested using two in vitro assays, yielding hit rates of 9.4% (24/256) in the pseudotyped particle (PP) entry assay and 37% (47/128) in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) assay. The top compounds showed potencies around 1 µM. This study provides a framework for virtual screening of virus-selective and pan- antivirals against emerging pathogens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.