Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542181›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2025

Cultural tendencies in generative AI.

Jackson G Lu, Lesley Luyang Song, Lu Doris Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jackson G Lu *MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. lu18@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-9171
Lesley Luyang Song *Advanced Institute of Business, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5153-8175
Lu Doris Zhang *MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6029-9081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We show that generative artificial intelligence (AI) models-trained on textual data that are inherently cultural-exhibit cultural tendencies when used in different human languages. Here we focus on two foundational constructs in cultural psychology: social orientation and cognitive style. First, we analyse GPT's responses to a large set of measures in both Chinese and English. When used in Chinese (versus English), GPT exhibits a more interdependent (versus independent) social orientation and a more holistic (versus analytic) cognitive style. Second, we replicate these cultural tendencies in ERNIE, a popular generative AI model in China. Third, we demonstrate the real-world impact of these cultural tendencies. For example, when used in Chinese (versus English), GPT is more likely to recommend advertisements with an interdependent (versus independent) social orientation. Fourth, exploratory analyses suggest that cultural prompts (for example, prompting generative AI to assume the role of a Chinese person) can adjust these cultural tendencies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCultureChinaHumansLanguage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.