SynthesisHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Evaluating blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Battle of the giants: KDIGO vs. Cochrane - who is the winner in the fight for blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease?Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaPooled it
- Renal diseases and blood pressure dysregulation in acute care: Pathophysiology, clinical patterns.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Season-adaptive blood pressure management in older adults with CKD: a practical review.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
- Systolic blood pressure strata and acute kidney injury risk in heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- The conservative-challenging paradigm of antihypertensive therapy in JSH2025: a comparative perspective with contemporary Western guidelines.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Advancing evidence-based blood pressure targets in JSH2025.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease: comparison between JSH2025 and other international guidelines.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Impact of office and home blood pressure control on cardiovascular events in relation to KDIGO risk categories: findings from the J-HOP study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Management of hypertension in specific populations: a review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have investigated optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, no consensus has been reached. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, including the latest randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi Web for publications up to 13 June 2024, supplemented by hand searches. We included RCTs comparing the benefits and risks of more intensive (target BP: <130/80 mmHg) versus less intensive BP control (target BP: 130-149/80-89 mmHg or usual care) in patients with CKD aged ≥18 years, regardless of diabetes status. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included renal events, including 50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)/GFR, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and variance, and obtained summary estimates of the effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Our meta-analysis included nine RCTs. More intensive BP control tended to reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-1.00; p = 0.051) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.77-1.03; p = 0.13), but the differences were not significant. More intensive BP control did not increase the risk of serious renal events, including 50% reduction in eGFR/GFR (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.22; p = 0.69) or progression to ESKD (RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.75-1.14; p = 0.45). These findings suggest that intensive BP control targeting <130/80 mmHg may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD, without increasing the risk of serious renal events. This meta-analysis of nine RCTs in patients with CKD found that more intensive BP control tended to reduce all-cause mortality and CVD events compared with less intensive control, without increasing serious kidney events, including 50% eGFR/GFR reduction, or ESKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40542174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.