ArticleScientific reports2025
Transabdominal ultrasound for the characterization and follow-up of cystic pancreatic lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cystic pancreatic lesions (CPL) pose a diagnostic challenge due to their morphological diversity and malignant potential. Given the limited study data, transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is currently not established for either primary diagnostics or CPL monitoring. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of TAUS in the assessment of CPL to that of the reference method, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), to identify patient subgroups suitable for TAUS monitoring. In a monocentric, retrospective analysis, patients with CPL who underwent EUS and TAUS within six months from 01/2016 to 06/2022 were included. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify determinants for the detection of CPL via TAUS. Cross-method morphological assessments were analysed, and a patient-specific algorithm for selecting the appropriate monitoring method was developed. Among 105 patients, CPL were detected by both EUS and TAUS in 90 patients (86%). Patients with "TAUS negative" CPL (n = 15) exhibited greater body mass indices (BMI, p = 0.002) and smaller CPL diameters (p = 0.043). The final multivariate model (BMI, age, CPL diameter) yielded an 85% accuracy in predicting CPL detectability by TAUS. TAUS could be a cost-effective and patient-friendly imaging method for the surveillance of CPL in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.