ArticleScientific reports2025
A psychometric study of the team psychological safety scale and sport psychological safety inventory in Swedish elite sports.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological safety in sport: validation of the French Sport Psychological Safety Inventory (SPSI-FR).Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Leadership micro-behaviors and performance stability under competitive pressure: a stepped-wedge field study in professional football.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies investigating psychological safety in sports and non-sports contexts have mostly utilized the universal Team Psychological Safety Scale (TPSS) aimed for performance development in professional teams. The Sport Psychological Safety Inventory (SPSI) has recently been introduced for psychological safety measurement specifically in sports. The aim of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the TPSS and the SPSI within an elite sport context. A cross-sectional survey was used to collect data for assessment of the internal consistency, factorial validity, construct validity and measurement invariance of the TPSS and the SPSI. Complete data sets were provided by 371 elite Athletics athletes (track and field) and orienteers. Both the TPSS (ω = 0.72) and the SPSI subscales (range: ω = 0.81-0.88) showed acceptable internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated a mediocre to good model fit for the TPSS and the SPSI three-factor correlated structure. The TPSS and the SPSI subscale 'mentally healthy environment' showed a moderate correlation. Measurement invariance tests suggested the TPSS to be fully invariant across genders, while the SPSI was found non-invariant. The study shows that the TPSS appears sound for assessing psychological safety in elite sports, while caution is needed when using the SPSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.