Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40542056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative assessment of standalone and hybrid deep neural networks for modeling daily pan evaporation in a semi-arid environment.

Mohammed Achite, Manish Kumar, Nehal Elshaboury, Aman Srivastava, Ahmed Elbeltagi, Ali Salem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed AchiteFaculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Water and Environment Laboratory, University Hassiba Benboual of Chlef, Chlef, B.P. 78C, Ouled Fares, 02180 , Algeria.
Manish KumarCollege of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. R.P.C.A.U, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, 848125, India.
Nehal ElshabouryConstruction and Project Management Research Institute, Housing and Building National Research Centre, Giza, 12311, Egypt.
Aman SrivastavaFormerly, Centre for Technology Alternatives for Rural Areas (CTARA), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Ahmed ElbeltagiAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. ahmedelbeltagy81@mans.edu.eg.
Ali SalemCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, 61111, Egypt. salem.ali@mik.pte.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaporation represents a fundamental hydrological cycle process that demands dependable methods to quantify its fluctuation to ascertain sustainable agriculture, irrigation systems, and overall water resource management. Meteorological variables such as relative humidity, temperature, wind speed, and sunshine hours affect evaporation non-linearly, resulting in challenges while developing prediction models. To combat this, the study aimed to develop robust models for estimating evaporation in semi-arid environments by applying machine learning techniques. Daily meteorological datasets (from January 2000 to December 2010) for the above variables (input) were collected from the Sidi Yakoub meteorological station in the Wadi Sly basin, Algeria. Conventional deep neural network (DNN) coupled with support vector machine (SVM), Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), random subspace (RSS), M5 pruned, and random forest (RF) were used for developing prediction models using various input variable combinations. Model performances were compared using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R

Indexed as

Deep neural networkMachine learningMeteorological variablesPan evaporationSemi-arid regions

Identifiers

PMID40542056
PMCPMC12181372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.