ArticleScientific reports2025
The effect of sensor-to-source distance on magnetic neuromuscular signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetomyography (MMG) can be used as a contactless modality to study the neuromuscular system. On the one hand, being contactless is a practical advantage as there is no need to prepare skin or attach electrodes as in electromyography (EMG). On the other hand, it is also a disadvantage because the magnetic field decays with increasing distance. However, the effect of sensor-to-source distance in MMG has not been systematically studied. Comparative in vivo and in silico experiments of the effect of sensor-to-source distance were performed. In vivo, muscle activity was recorded using simultaneous surface EMG and one triaxial optically pumped magnetometer (OPM). For the simulations, an established multiscale muscle model was used to predict how distance affects the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the signal's spectral content. Given an environmental noise level of 0.5-1 pT root-mean-square (RMS) from 10 to 350 Hz, it was impossible to robustly detect muscle activity of one finger flexor muscle beyond a distance of two centimeters using OPM technology. In silico experiments showed a high SNR between 8 and 29 for MMG at 0.5 cm distance. Increasing the distance increases the MMG's median frequency content. The simulations uncovered that this is due to the effect of noise. For distances greater than two centimeters, measuring MMG of voluntary contractions in medium-sized muscles with current OPM technology and conventional magnetic shielding cannot be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.